This blog is for the purpose of defining , and giving examples of those who may be objective skeptics , but are willing to actually conduct legitimate investigations of any subject , while others are persons who do NOT conduct any type of objective search for truth ,but just simply claim to have actual knowledge , and expect blind acceptance , with NO proof .
Example 1. "The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry", claims to base their views on scientific investigational evidence . But in my opinion , NONE of the persons in this organization truly investigate , but just simply deny most claims made by either amateurs or professionals who were actually on the scene at the time of the events !
The most prominent of these are Joe Nickel,
who I choose to refer to as Joe (not worth a plugged) Nickel.
I freely admit to my personal lack of respect for anything he has to say on any issue I have ever heard him speak on.
One of his classic proclamations is , that Rendlesham forest Air force base personnel
could not tell the difference between several lights moving through the forest from many directions , were ONLY the mistaken results of ONE beam of light , from the coastal light house.
He also ASSUMES , that military professionals who were stationed on what was then , a highly secure air base where Nuclear Weapons were stored , would use inferior radiation detection equipment , to check radiation levels in the landing marks.
As usual , he makes such assumptions , despite the FACT , that he was NOT there when it happened !
Please feel free to comment or give examples of who you feel are legitimate skeptics , or just plain deniers.
No comments:
Post a Comment