Have you ever wondered why so called "skeptics" , who ask for real proof of UFO evidence , will consistently FAIL to consider the fact , that anyone who does not have a security clearance about 37 levels ABOVE TOP SECRET , can not just walk into a facility like Area 51 , S4 , Dugway Proving Grounds , or Wright Patterson Air Force Base , without risk of being shredded into a pile of HAMBURGER by several guards with machine guns. Personally , I would like to see some of the smug deniers try that !
And have you noticed , that anytime the "skeptics" who claim that alien bodies found at the Roswell crash of 1947 , were just misidentified crash test dummies, will ALSO fail to mention why
a Roswell funeral home employee, Glen Dennis received a call from the air base asking to buy his entire supply of child sized caskets , to bury 6 foot crash test dummies !
What some people use for brains , Most People FLUSH into the sewars !
SKEPTIC , OR DENIER ?
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
To Investigate or just Proclaim !
This blog is for the purpose of defining , and giving examples of those who may be objective skeptics , but are willing to actually conduct legitimate investigations of any subject , while others are persons who do NOT conduct any type of objective search for truth ,but just simply claim to have actual knowledge , and expect blind acceptance , with NO proof .
Example 1. "The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry", claims to base their views on scientific investigational evidence . But in my opinion , NONE of the persons in this organization truly investigate , but just simply deny most claims made by either amateurs or professionals who were actually on the scene at the time of the events !
The most prominent of these are Joe Nickel,
who I choose to refer to as Joe (not worth a plugged) Nickel.
I freely admit to my personal lack of respect for anything he has to say on any issue I have ever heard him speak on.
One of his classic proclamations is , that Rendlesham forest Air force base personnel
could not tell the difference between several lights moving through the forest from many directions , were ONLY the mistaken results of ONE beam of light , from the coastal light house.
He also ASSUMES , that military professionals who were stationed on what was then , a highly secure air base where Nuclear Weapons were stored , would use inferior radiation detection equipment , to check radiation levels in the landing marks.
As usual , he makes such assumptions , despite the FACT , that he was NOT there when it happened !
Please feel free to comment or give examples of who you feel are legitimate skeptics , or just plain deniers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)